Essay on The Death Penalty - 1554 Words

Almost all nations in the world either have the death sentence or have had it at one time. It was used in most cases to punish those who broke the laws or standards that were expected of them. Since the death penalty wastes tax money, is inhumane, and is largely unnecessary it should be abolished in every state across the United States. The use of the death penalty puts the United States in the same category as countries like Iran and Saudi Arabia which are two of the world’s worst human rights violators (Friedman 34). Lauri Friedman quotes, â€Å"Executions simply inject more violence into an already hostile American society.† The cost of the Death Penalty is highly expensive. A case to put someone in jail costs on average two million†¦show more content†¦Lynn Pasquerella quotes, â€Å"Executing a murderer does not change what has been done nor does it compensate for the less suffered by the victim and the victim’s family.† The eighth amendme nt in the United States constitution prohibits the cruel and unusual punishment of a person therefore the death penalty should be prohibited in every state in the United States. Is it right to administer the death penalty if the crime is not proven justly and in full? There is always a possibility that the death penalty could be administered to someone who was innocent. Since the death penalty was reinstated a hundred and thirty nine death row inmates have been exonerated, according to the Death Penalty Information Center (Overall). In 2009 alone nine death row inmates were exonerated after courts overturned conviction because of lack of evidence. This ranks the second highest number of exonerations since the death penalty was reinstated in the United States (Overall). With this stated, do we know as citizens that every inmate on death row is guilty? Do we wish to persecute an innocent man or woman and have their family suffer daily from the loss of the family member? No, we as citizens do not know these things for certain and it would be better to administer life in prison than to murder an innocent man or woman. Sixty three percent on Gallup Poll sa y an innocent person has been executed in the lastShow MoreRelatedThe Death Penalty Is Justified1143 Words   |  5 PagesAllison Shu 2/25/16 Period 2 Objective paper on the death penalty Capital punishment is legally authorized killing as punishment for a crime. The death penalty questions the morality of killing a person as justification for their crime. It also brings to question whether the death penalty actually serves as a deterrent for crime, and that some of the people executed are found innocent afterwards. The debates over the constitutionality of the death penalty and whether capital punishment should be usedRead MoreThe Death Penalty For Juveniles946 Words   |  4 Pages The death penalty for minors differs greatly from the death penalty for adult. The law that minor could be put on death row was decided to rule against the eighth amendment. The eighth amendment prohibits the act of â€Å"cruel and unusual punishment† which putting minors on death row breaks. On March 4, 2005 the law that minors could not be put on death row for their actions was set into place. The new laws say, â€Å"They cannot punish a minor by death penalty and they cannot punish someone for a crimeRead MorePro Death Penalty Speech1482 Words   |  6 Pagesintroduce myself before we get started. My name is Slick Perry and if you didn’t already know, I am the state governor of Texas. You are all aware that we are reviewing our recidivism rate to various crimes and reviewing our stance regarding the death penalty as we approach 2009. Everyone here understands that capital punishment is a very controversial topic in the United States. In Texas, from December 1982 through August 2008, only 361 criminals of the millions of Texans in our good state were executedRead MoreShould The Death Penalty Be Mandatory?925 Words   |  4 Pagesopinions on the subject. When we were discussing the death penalty although my opinion didn’t change, after hearing what some of my classmates had to say about the subject during our lab I was able to respectfully see why they had those thoughts and feelings about the subject. I believe that we should have the death penalty, and that it helps prevents more crime from happening. However, during our lab students that thought we should ban the death penalty had some pretty interesting reasons behind theirRead MoreThe Truth About The Death Penalty973 Words   |  4 Pages In her article â€Å"The Truth About The Death Penalty†, Carina Kolodny argues that the death penalty should be abolished in all fifty states due to the fact that it is ineffective and very expensive. Kolodny believes that capital punishment has too many complications and variables that cause it be more of an issue than a real solution for capital offenses. She proposes that the death penalty should be dropped and exchanged for better programs such as Proposition 34, which replaces capital punishmentRead MoreThe Death Penalty Should Be Legal1805 Words   |  8 Pagesthat we all know is the death penalty. This penalty has been going around for years. To many people it might be the best way of punishing a person. On the other hand there are people who think that if you kill a person you should be sentenced to die as well. For me I would say it might not be the best way and it not working as many would like it. When choosing if you are for the death penalty you have to okay with an insect person dyeing or even a family member being in death row. I know that is somethingRead MoreThe Death Penalty : An Effective Reliable Tool904 Words   |  4 Pagesthe death penalty has been a frequent topic of discussion, as our recent technological advancements have evidently led individuals to consider the â€Å"new found† legitimacy of our court systems, as statistics display that our previous racial bias and the apparent morality of the practice itself have a miniscule impact on our conviction rate. Both the advancements and ethics that the death penalty provides become apparent through the utilization of anecdotes and statistics, as the death penalty has prevailedRead MoreThe Bible and Death Penalty Essay example812 Words   |  4 Pagesa person’s view of the Bible influence what they think about the death penalty for murderers.† I would like to see if a person’s view of the bible influence what they think of the death penalty. This is interesting to me because I am interested in the field of criminal justice and the death penalty is a huge topic to this day. There are many journals that talk about studies that were done on religion and views of the death penalty which have to do with my topic of interest. My hypothesis is thatRead More The Death Penalty Is Archaic and Immoral Essays559 Words   |  3 Pages The death penalty is simply a modernized version of the Holy Bible’s â€Å"an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, a hand for a hand, a foot for a foot†. Some argue that death is a necessary retribution for murderous cases - but is it effective morally? Revenge only glorifies violence, which is most definitely not the message the world strives to display. The death penalty is a negative form of punishment and insinuates a harsh reflection of society economically, politically, and socially. Read MoreEssay on Death Penalty - Herrera vs Collins1337 Words   |  6 PagesDeath Penalty - Herrera vs Collins The Supreme Court addressed the constitutionality of executing someone who claimed actual innocence in Herrera v. Collins (506 U.S. 390 (1993)). Although the Court left open the possibility that the Constitution bars the execution of someone who conclusively demonstrates that he or she is actually innocent, the Court noted that such cases would be very rare. The Court held that, in the absence of other constitutional violations, new evidence of innocence is no

Government Or Controlled Demolition Essay - 1219 Words

Government or Controlled Demolition The September 11 attacks were a series of four coordinated terrorist attacks by the Islamic terrorist group al-Qaeda in the United States on the morning of Tuesday, September 11, 2001. They attacked the Twin Towers in New York City. There are different conspiracy theories with the 9/11 attack but the most important conspiracy theory is that the collapse of the twin towers were the result of controlled demolition by the government rather than structural failure due to impact and fire. Now the question remains, was it controlled demolition or was it terrorist attacking the World Trade Center on purpose? This conspiracy theory revolves around authorities knowing about the attackers and also guiding them to complete their terror attack. None of the deaths would have happened without the deliberate unplugging of Americas air defense. The twin tower did not fall of plane impacts or fire. People claim that jet fuel doesn’t melt steel beams. It was a controlled explosion by the government. â€Å"Our mission is to expose the official lies in a way that inspires the people to overcome denial and understand the truth.† People want answers to what happened that morning, devastation all around. Conspiracy theorists believe that the government dismissed all the signs that were in their face because this attack was a controlled demolition. Dr. Griffin concluded that, it is already possible to know, beyond a reasonable doubt, one very important thing: theShow MoreRelatedTerrorist Attacks On The United States1453 Words   |  6 PagesAmericans started to believe in conspiracies proving the government was behind it all. To add, Americans also believed that the U.S. government knew in advance of the terrorist attacks on September 11th due to the time between the attacks and the Bush administration’s attempt to investigate, the National Security Association’s lack of investigation of suspicious phone calls, and the odd â€Å"collapse† of World Trade Center Seven. However, the government tried to counter attack with the points that Al QaedaRead MoreThe Bombing Of The United States1463 Words   |  6 PagesAmericans started to believe in conspiracies proving the government was behind it all. Americans believe that the U.S. government knew in advance of the terrorist attacks on September 11th due to the time between the attacks and the Bush administration’s attempt to investigate, the National Security Association’s lack of investigation of suspicious phone calls, and the odd â€Å"collapse† of World Trade Center building 7. However, the government tried to counter attack with the points that Al Qaeda wasRead MoreThe Patriot Act Through Congress Essay1601 Words   |  7 Pagescontinue reading this essay with an open mind as I shed light on the fact that United States government was actually behind the whole thing. Thinking about the government knowing about these attacks and doing nothing about it is sickening. Nobody wants to believe it, and that makes it all the ever more important. The first thing that may come to mind when trying to comprehend this idea is, why would the government want to do something like this anyway? One theory suggests that they needed to push theRead MoreThe Theory of Controlled Demolition that let to the Collape of the World Trade Center982 Words   |  4 PagesThe theory of controlled demolition that let to the collape of the World Trade Center, was widely believed and a potential possibility. Demolition experts reviewed the videos of the World Trade Center falling and they agreed about how a controlled demolition could have been the cause of the collapse. According to experts, the building fell as if many small explosives were planted on all sides and it exploded in a very specific order. This is very similar to a controlled demolition. When videos ofRead MoreSumm ary : Loose Change 1264 Words   |  6 PagesPentagon’s attack and WTC’s collapse. It implies that the September 11 attack was plotted by American government and the purpose of economic issue from the hegemony financial group and reglious issue of Islam. Before the 9/11 attacks, the world has no clear perception about the Middle East. However, after 9/11 the Middle East Islam has been tagged with terroist. The film argues that the American government has prior knowledge of terrorist attacks and has some relationship with radical changes in foreignRead More9/11 Conspiracy Theories Essay1164 Words   |  5 PagesCenters on September 11, 2001, but there are a select few that, similar to the truth, cannot be disproved without quite a bit of effort. One theory is that the Twin Towers were destroyed by controlled demolitions. Another idea of what happened is that planes did hit the towers, but they were remote controlled. A third theory is that Al Qaeda is not responsible for the 9-11 attacks (The Top September 11 Conspiracy Theories, n.d.). And last, but certainly not least, is the theory that the 9-11 attacksRead MoreThe Events That Took Place On September 111144 Words   |  5 Pagesplaced in the basement of the buildings, set to detonate at the exact time that the planes hit the towers. These bombs were set up by our own government. The government did this so that they could steal gold and oil while maintaining public hatred among the Middle East and terrorism. Several videos show that the buildings collapsed like a controlled demolition. The south tower collapsed in one hour of burning and the north collapsed in two hours of burning. It is fact that fire has never broughtRead MoreWhat Happened Was An Accident?1285 Words   |  6 Pages bringing the towers down in controlled implosions and killing over 3000 American citizens that day. This would explain why both of the buildings collapsed so quickly reaching free-fall speed, both neatly and symmetrically, collapsing completely into smithereens creating huge clouds of dust and ash, leaving no remains of their massive central vertical steel columns left standing. Due to the intelligence of some Americans, who thought hard about the U.S. government s explanation of the events ofRead MoreThe Events Of September 11th1646 Words   |  7 Pagescan create. The events of September 11th happened so fast that lots of details were overlooked but now, six years later one can finally take a breath and really look into what happened. The inevitable outcome is simply that George W. Bush and his government secretly put together the events of September 11th to rally the support of the U.S. citizens on many issues. This is such a strong accusation to make but a little common sense and evidence can quickly refute that our president is anything but aRead MoreQuestions On The World Trade Center Terror Attacks1538 Words   |  7 Pagesdetailed picture on the conspiracies behind 9/11 ranging from the catastrophe was a false flag operation in order to rationalise the war on terror commencing to the government knew it would happen and didn’t stop the terrorists from acting out their operations and to the towers coming down like a tonne of bricks was caused by controlled demolition. The contents of this documentary will be relevant for questions 2 and 3 as it would explain some strong key theories and elaborate on them and because of the

Language Nation and Development System †Free Samples to Students

Question: Discuss about the Language Nation and Development System. Answer: Introduction: Aquiono government aimed at making Philippines a success story with exit of Marcos and entry of Cory, democracy was set into place. Dictator ruling Aquino went on to coup attempts which made to solve problems which Marcoses had caused(Gonzalez, 2007). There had been various contradictory views regarding Philippines that lagged to comfort masses as it was far from being realists. While countries around Philippines had been developing rapidly as Japan, Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore and so on. In Philippines there had been contrary beliefs, leading to cultures management making the country poor inspite of it being naturally rich. Culture along with its political system remains the major barrier for development in the country. However, currently the economy has stopped shrinking since the Marcos years. There are various rich Filipinos who have brought back tremendous amounts capital in the country. The prevailing culture however led to failure to develop a feeling of nationalism amongst it s population(Bankoff, 2016). Democracy has made its way back into Philippines in a major manner, along with incorporating in election processes. Rumors regarding impending coups have been cropping ever since that occupies political Manila scandals. Reference Lists Bankoff, G. (2016). Hazardousness of place: A new comparative approach to the Filipino past. Philippine Studies: Historical and Ethnographic Viewpoints, 335-357. Gonzalez, A. (2007). Language, nation and development management in the Philippines. Language nation and development, 7-16.

The Authorship of Hebrews

Introduction Regardless of its profound harshness, the letter to the Hebrews has something peculiar about it. It is anonymous. The author and the addressees are mysterious since they have not been indicated in the book. Indeed, the ambiguity has cast doubts among some interpreters who cannot relate its anticipated purpose in a given framework.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on The Authorship of Hebrews specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Furthermore, its obscurity has made theologians conceptualize, as well as generalize the content to fit various contexts. Indeed, due to its anonymity, one might assert that the expression ‘without a father, without a mother, without genealogy’ best befits the book’s position. Over the ages, scholars have attempted to find out the human author of the book of Hebrews. Traditional theologians believe it is Paul while contemporary scholars contest this stance by linking the book to several other authors. This paper seeks to explain the authorship of the Hebrews even as the extrication of the mystery continues. Authorship of the Book of Hebrews Believers of the Alexandria school of thought such as Wright among other scholars averred that the human author is Paul.1 They supported their belief with several internal references from the epistle. However, in North Africa, Tertullian had a contrasting view, alluding that the letter must have been written by Barnabas. Modern scholars have further insisted that Paul was not the author. Others claim that the author could be Apollos, Priscilla, or Clement. Indeed, according to Wagner, no other section of the New Testament has attracted theological dispute as the Hebrews.2 Based on this general evidence, the subsequent section of the paper will analyze individuals who have been linked to the authorship of the book of Hebrews. Paul Paul was among the first individuals to be associated with the autho rship of Hebrews. Pantaenus of Alexandria chose Paul as the writer. The name was barely opposed until the period of reformation. Paul had the strongest support from Alexandria. Gradually, the name gained the followership of Jerome and Augustine, particularly during the fourth century. The Pauline authorship view was mainly backed by the basic argument that Paul had a good understanding of the Old Testament. Pauline greeting signature is present in the book. Furthermore, the recognition of Timothy in the book in chapter 13 verse 23 as a friend to Paul substantiated Pauline authorship. However, not only the supporters but also critics have found the above reasons inconclusive. It appears that the major intention of identifying Paul as the writer was to offer the book a canonical position.Advertising Looking for research paper on religion theology? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Most contemporary theologians, Catholics or Prote stants, object designating Paul as the author. Foremost, the grammar and vocabulary that are dominant in the book of Hebrews may be termed as the master rhetorician, namely the Greek style. The style contradicts Paul’s writing technique. Observers such as Cockerill assert that Paul often adjusted his torrent of thoughts, especially in the process of ending a letter.3 Paul’s technique contradicts the anonymous authorship, which utilizes Greek writing styles. Furthermore, although Paul was familiar with the Old Testament teachings as witnessed in the case of the writer of the letter, the manner in which the teachings are quoted in Hebrews is inconsistent with Paul’s style. Secondly, the nonexistence of Paul’s name is also a major point of criticism. Regarding the letters of Paul, he had the habit of introducing himself and his mission as a follower of Christ. Furthermore, he identified himself as the Gentiles’ messenger. For instance, he says,  "For this I am ordained a preacher and an apostle as I speak in truth†¦as teacher of the Gentiles in faith and verity† (NIV 1Tim 2:7) Further references in Romans 11: 13 and Galatians 2:8 confirm this style. Expositors such as Bateman claim that the style indicated how Paul remained ardent based on his key mission of speaking to the Gentiles.4 Thirdly, the writer seems to have a second-hand knowledge. The author asserts, â€Å"How shall we escape, if we neglect so great salvation, which began to be spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed unto us by them that heard him† (NIV Heb 2:3). Paul could not have spoken from a second-hand experience since he had the actual understanding. As per the author, he or she must have learned about Christ from others. Paul was emphatic as evident in his epistles. According to Nelson, he knew Christ through revelation but not men.5 The contradiction triggers doubt among scholars who seek to unravel the Hebrews mystery. Paul says,  "For I neither received if of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ† (NIV Gal 1:12). Some of the challenges facing the Pauline authorship have been explained over the years. First, Clement explained that the nonexistence of Paul’s signature in the letter followed his (Paul) need to conceal his identity from the Hebrews. The Hebrews disliked him and that they could have possibly opposed his teachings. As a result, Clement asserts that Paul drafted the epistle in Hebrews and that Luke later translated into Greek. Although Paul was a messenger to the Gentiles, his letter to the Hebrews was because of his superabundant love and grace of reaching all people via the word of God. Therefore, the lack of Paul’s signature should not deny the title of authoring the book. Moreover, ruling out Paul as the author because his name is absent in the book may simply mean that no other authors should be given credit for the book because it mentions no one.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on The Authorship of Hebrews specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Furthermore, the contradictory statement made by the author in Hebrews 2:3 would simply mean that Paul was affirming that he was not among the first twelve apostles of Christ. Certainly, he was in the company of the first disciples such as Simon Peter, Mathew, and John who listened to Christ’s teachings. However, this assertion does not conflict with his message to the Galatians. The first apostles were always viewed as the spiritual leaders of the Jewish religionists. They always led Paul whenever he visited Jerusalem as evident in Acts 21: 18-26. According to Cockerill, since Paul was writing to Jews who submitted to the first apostles, it would be right if Paul identified with the Jews and/or recognized the spiritual leadership of the first disciples.6 Despite the skepticism on Paul’s authors hip of Hebrews, no evidence has been established to prove or disprove his authorship. Supporters of Clement’s view use internal evidence such as the acknowledgment of Timothy in the epistle as a ground to corroborate their belief. Perversely, critics such as Guthrie proclaim that the language that is used in the document and the absence of evidence mentioning Paul create a loophole for examining the possibility of other authors as suggested by contemporary researchers.7 Priscilla and Aquila After identifying the haziness in crediting Paul’s authorship of Hebrews, modern intellectuals proceeded to recognize other authors such as Priscilla and Aquila. Guthrie claims that the letter was prepared by Priscilla assisted by her husband, Aquila. The name of Priscilla was absent chiefly because the early church did not encourage such top positions for women in the Church. Indeed, Priscilla and Aquila were qualified teachers of the gospel as attested in Acts 18:26. Using interna l evidence, they were in a position to recognize Timothy since they had interacted with him. Furthermore, they had led a Church in Rome, which would have been the destiny of the epistle. From an initial reading, Guthrie’s view seems tenable. However, a further scrutiny reveals the damaging drawbacks. First, the letter might have been sent having an unidentified author and recipient so that it can communicate the gospel in various regions, especially Syria and North Africa. The claim is explicable. However, it is inconceivable why the document would be circulated in Rome anonymously. Moreover, according to Hoppin, it is implausible to presume that the hypothesized author concealed her name because of the religious view of women during the early church.8 An author who has been inspired by the Holy Spirit to write to the Church would readily be accepted for the unanimously beneficial qualities. Moreover, one cannot discount that the book was a personal exposition and not a gener al document.Advertising Looking for research paper on religion theology? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Priscilla had resided and hosted believers in their house in Rome where she taught them the gospel. Paul even acknowledges her in his letter to the Romans. Priscilla must have had friends and disciples in Rome who supported and adored her. The premise that the feminine authorship would have been repelled by the recipients is flawed. Even if it would be supposed that the Roman Church discouraged women from occupying top positions in Church, it is obvious not the entire Church would have disregarded Priscilla and her teachings. Another detrimental error in the theory of Priscilla’s authorship can be drawn from the internal evidence. The original Greek grammar that is used in the book of Hebrews shows the author using a masculine language when identifying himself. According to Nelson, the masculine participle in Hebrews 11.32 conveys an obvious message.9 The author is a male. Grammatical errors are indefensible. Allowing such a pretext could open a platform for other researchers to substantiate their thoughts with flawed information. The scripture is flawless. If the feminine authorship were warranted, the language used in the verse would have helped in affirming the claim. Contritely, the masculine grammar closes the discourse on whether Priscilla was indeed the author. If the masculine participle referred to Aquila, then he, and not Priscilla, should have primacy. It follows that Priscilla’s authorship should not be tolerated.10 Barnabas When the ideology that Paul was the anonymous author of Hebrews received incessant objection, the early Church fathers gave an alternative option, that is, Barnabas. Barnabas wrote the epistle to believers in Jerusalem to address specific issues that the Church was facing. As a Levite, Barnabas was conversant with the Jewish traditions. He was a companion of Paul in spreading the gospel. These facts are consistent with the internal evidence. According to Bateman, it is also apparent from the book of Hebrews that t he author must have been a person of great prowess and mental adaptability.11 The author utilizes teachings from Peter, Stephen, James, and Paul. Barnabas qualifies perfectly with the character of mysterious Hebrews’ author. Acts 4 refers to him as a ‘Son of Encouragement.’12 He had a great impact on Jerusalem in companion with other apostles. Christians in Antioch treated him with remarkable reverence.13 The Jewish features of Hebrews suggest that the book was not written by Paul but rather a believer who had Jewish characteristics. Therefore, Barnabas would be best placed to understand the significance of practicing in the Jewish Church than any regular Jewish nonprofessional person. One would assert that his transition to Christianity would make him consider the Jewish traditions deceptive.14 However, this claim would be improbable since his conversion was a quiet development. Furthermore, the epistle regards the Jews as the original beneficiaries of the gospe l, a position that Barnabas and Paul also held. However, Paul who deemed himself a missionary to the Gentiles gradually detracted from the ideology. This finding declares Barnabas who was still in good connection with the Jews the most qualified candidate.15 Barnabas is viewed as the Jewish apostle. He was in a good position to preach to the Jewish Christians. Likewise, the character of Barnabas is consistent with the writer of Hebrews. Furthermore, both Barnabas and Paul played an important role in Timothy’s transition to Christianity. Consequently, just as the mentioning of Timothy in the letter was initially linked to Paul, it should be linked to Barnabas. The consistency of the suppositions easily leads one to credit Barnabas with the authorship of the book of Hebrews. Furthermore, scholars have claimed that the anonymous author either was a priest or had a priestly background. Out of the several names that have been suggested by various theologians, this inference princi pally coincides with Barnabas.16 Certainly, some of the qualities of the books’ authorship are in uniformity with Barnabas. Barnabas’ major task was to encourage believers. This role is inconsistent with the writer of Hebrews who provides a ‘word of exhortation’ as evident in Hebrews 13:22. Hence, most scholars seem to have ignored the aforementioned Tertullian opinion. There is inadequate literature supporting or criticizing Barnabas as the author of Hebrews. Apollos As indicated earlier, the increased interest concerning the authorship and destination of the book of Hebrews began in the Reformation Period. One of the prominent religionists at the time, namely Martin Luther, suggested Apollos as the writer of this book. This proposition attracted the attention of most researchers because of the wording of Acts 18: 24-26.17 The extract from Acts was about Apollos was consistent with most characteristics of the unidentified author. Apollos was a male Hellen istic Jew. Besides being expressive, he had a profound knowledge of Greek and the Old Testament. He was conversant with the Alexandrian writing style, which was utilized by the author of Hebrews. Moreover, besides knowing the synagogue practices, he had interacted with believers in house churches based in Rome. He had a second-hand reception of Christ’s teachings based on how he preached the gospel with zeal. Apollos would appear the most qualified candidate for the title of Hebrews’ human author. In fact, modern theologians concur with Luther. However, Apollos lacks any documented support from the early believers. Indeed, it is puzzling why great theologians such as Clement and Origen did not notice that an Alexandrian was the actual writer of this interesting letter. If Apollos had been the author, the Alexandrian church would have known and celebrated him. The absence of such recognition casts a lot of doubt in Luther’s opinion. Nonetheless, the possibility o f Clement being the author is quickly disregarded because of the profound knowledge that is present in the text. Recommendations on the Authorship of Hebrews Having considered the thoughts of several theologians, both traditional and modern, some apparent recommendations are evident. The external and internal facts suggest that the author should be a male Hellenistic trained Jew who is conversant with Greek writing techniques. He should also have an Alexandrian background and a deep understanding of the Old Testament teachings. Moreover, he should be knowledgeable about the Jewish culture and in particular, the sacrificial practices. He must also have heard the teachings of other preachers and teachers of the gospel. Additionally, he should be a companion of Timothy and one who is familiar with Christians residing in the peripheries of the Mediterranean Sea.18 Considering the above proposal and recalling the qualifications of Apollos, one would easily conclude that he is the author. A further supposition would be that Apollos drafted the letter and passed it to his companions and teachers, Priscilla and her husband, Aquila. Later, Priscilla and Aquilla must have circulated the message to the Churches in Rome and North Africa. According to Gareth, they opted to conceal the name of the author for the obvious reason that they were not the original writers.19 However, since this contention has no scholarly backing, it can simply act as a point for further research. Meanwhile, readers can opt to either let the human author of Hebrews be a mystery or assume it is Paul. There has been an exhaustive study on why or why not Paul is the author. Indeed, the closing phrase in Hebrews coincides with other thirteen Pauline epistles. Paul was an educated apostle who was conversant with the Jewish practices and Greek viewpoints. He had been held captive in Italy. During his visit to Rome, he was assisted by his closest companion Timothy to communicate to the Churches from the West to East. Furthermore, he had a good comprehension of Mosaic laws and other Old Testament scriptures. Notably, various theologians have explained criticisms that have been raised against Pauline authorship of Hebrews. Hence, although it might be inconclusive, Paul seems the most conceivable author of the book of Hebrews among the entire list of suspected authors. Conclusion Scholastic uncertainty on the author of the book of Hebrews has existed for centuries. The puzzle is expected to continue for years. Theologians have used the existing external and internal evidence to reveal the mysterious human author. Several names have been suggested over years, with Paul, Apollos, Barnabas, Priscilla, and Aquilla being the most common inferences. Over years, it appears that premises that Paul or Apollos could be the author of the Hebrews are more tenable in relation to the other proclamations. Although Apollos lacks support from the early Church, this paper proposes him as the author. M eanwhile, no evidence to prove or disprove Paul has been established. He can also be considered the author as future researchers focus on getting evidence to support Apollos. Bibliography Bateman, Herbert. Four Views on the Warning Passages in Hebrews. Grand Rapids: Kregel Academic and Professional, 2007. Cockerill, Gareth. The Epistle to the Hebrews (New International Commentary on the New Testament). Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2012. Guthrie, George. Hebrews: The NIV Application Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1998. Hoppin, Ruth. The Epistle to the Hebrews is Priscilla’s Letter. London: AC Black, 2004. Nelson, Thomas. The NKJV Study Bible: Full-Color Edition. Tennessee: Thomas Nelson, 2014. Wagner, Brian. â€Å"The Authorship of Hebrews from an Evangelical Perspective of Church History.† Journal of Dispensational Theology 14, no. 43 (April 2010): 45-53. Wright, Tom. Hebrews for Everyone. Louisville: Westminster/John Knox Press, 2004 . Footnotes 1 Tom Wright, Hebrews for Everyone (Louisville: Westminster/John Knox Press, 2004), 89. 2 Brian Wagner, â€Å"The Authorship of Hebrews from an Evangelical Perspective of Church History†, Journal of Dispensational Theology 14, no. 43 (April 2010): 48. 3 Gareth Cockerill, The Epistle to the Hebrews (New International Commentary on the New Testament) (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2012), 43. 4 Herbert Bateman, Four Views on the Warning Passages in Hebrews (Grand Rapids: Kregel Academic and Professional, 2007), 32. 5 Thomas Nelson, The NKJV Study Bible: Full-Color Edition (Tennessee: Thomas Nelson, 2014), 1901. 6 Cockerill, The Epistle to the Hebrews, 74. 7 George Guthrie, Hebrews: The NIV Application Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1998), 67. 8 Ruth Hoppin, The Epistle to the Hebrews is Priscilla’s Letter (London: AC Black, 2004), 147-170. 9 Nelson, The NKJV Study Bible, 1981. 10 Hoppin, The Epistle to the Hebrews, 153. 11 Bat eman, Four Views, 45. 12 Nelson, The NKJV Study Bible, 1201. 13 Wagner, â€Å"The Authorship of Hebrews,† 49. 14 Wright, Hebrews for Everyone, 109. 15 Wagner, â€Å"The Authorship of Hebrews,† 52. 16 Guthrie, Hebrews: The NIV, 102. 17 Nelson, The NKJV Study Bible, 1310. 18 Wagner, â€Å"The Authorship of Hebrews,† 93. 19 Cockerill, The Epistle to the Hebrews, 47. This research paper on The Authorship of Hebrews was written and submitted by user Jovani S. to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.